The Power Protection Blog

July 21, 2009

The Benefits of the Modular UPS System

Filed under: Help Guides,Technology — Tags: , , , — toneus @ 3:31 pm

You may have read a lot about the Modular UPS System, and I hope to be able to state some of the key benefits / drawbacks here.

Firstly – expandability. Let us suppose you are developing a data room. The plan is to eventually have, for example, 25 cabinets, each with a power consumption of 3KVA = 75KVA total load. However, at present you only need power for 5 (15KVA), with the remainder being added over the next few years or so.

The sensible approach using the standard Uninterruptible Power Supply would be to fit an 80KVA model. However in the early days it would only be operating at less than 20% capacity. So you’ve shelled out for an 80KVA system that wont be at capacity for a couple of years. For an 80KVA system (excluding battery and installation) you’d be looking at a cost in the region of £8,000, depending on options.

With the Modular UPS, you would fit a 100KVA carrier, and 2x10KVA Power Modules at a cost of around £6,000. You can then add the additional 10KVA power modules as and when required at around £1,500 each.

The benefit here is that the initial outlay is lower, however the total cost will be higher, as you need to add in another 6x 10KVA Power Modules units, making the total cost £15,000 as opposed to £8,000 for the standard Uninterruptible Power Supply.

However, let us now suppose that we want a n+1 redundant solution. So with our standard Uninterruptible Power Supply model, we would put in 2x80KVA UPS Systems, at an upfront cost of £16,000. With the Modular UPS we can put in the 1 extra power module that we need, so our initial upfront cost is 1x 100KVA carrier, and 3x 10KVA Power Modules at a cost of around £7,500.

However, the real benefit is to do with the fact that to achieve n+1 we only need 90KVA of UPS power, as opposed to 160KVA in the configuration above. When the data centre is fully operational we would require 1x 100KVA carrier, and 9x 10KVA Power Modules at a cost of around £16,500. So, slightly more expensive but in an equivalent ball park, however other important factors are that the Modular UPS is in one cabinet with a small footprint, occupying probably half the space of the 2x 80KVA Standard UPS Systems and the fact that the power modules can be easily swapped in the event of a fault – thereby improving on availability figures.

It would be remiss of me however, not to include a third scenario. N+1 Redundancy is achieved by having one more Uninterruptible Power Supply than is needed to do the job. Therefore, it is possible to use, for example 3x40KVA UPS Systems, or 4x30KVA UPS Systems, that too, can grow with demand. If we take the latter, we would need initially 2x30KVA UPS Systems at a £6,000 outlay. You can add another for another £3,000, and then finally have the last in, at a total cost of £12,000. Of course, this price excludes batteries and installation. However, in this instance you need to have room for 4 UPS Systems!

I have also not included the additional costs of switch gear needed for the standard Uninterruptible Power Supply Solution. So, taking this into account, along with the additional floor space needed, you would have to argue that the Modular UPS would be a good solution.

There is another factor that gives the Modular UPS a wholesale advantage over other methods and that is efficiency. Let us assume for a moment, that the Modular UPS and the Standard Uninterruptible Power Supply, all share the same efficiency at full load. It is clear that UPS systems operating at half load or less will be less efficient. With 2x80KVA UPS Systems on a 75KVA load, each UPS will be operating at 47% load, whereas the Modular UPS with 90KVA of power available, will be operating at 83% load. So there is probably some running cost calculation that you could also take into account.

Money makes the world go round as they say, so if I were looking for simple UPS support, I’d opt for the standard Uninterrupibtle Power Supply, however if I was needing to include some redundancy in there, the Modular UPS is starting to look like a great contender.

April 10, 2009

Local Vs Centralised UPS

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , — toneus @ 10:20 am

I read this article about an Australian University to Save £200k by a variety of energy saving schemes, one of which was to use local UPS systems instead of a central UPS system.

There are course, pro’s and con’s for each approach, but I hadn’t considered the efficiency angle before. When you look at it as a whole, then there is no way lots of individual UPS systems can be more efficient than one big one. Most centralised UPS systems will operate at no more than 50% load (due to redundancy -so if one UPS fails the other can support 100% load), and this is where a lot of efficiency is lost. Most UPS systems will be more efficient at full load than at half load (or less).

With point of use UPS systems, if you wanted to maintain redundancy, the same effect would occur. You would have two systems running at half load. Since each UPS system also requires its own onboard controller, you would think that this power loss would add up throughout the data center, in order to make the data centre less, rather than more efficient.

However, the real gain with using local systems is that you can size them exactly. With a centralised system you need to define what the maximum power consumption will be now, and at any time in the future and put in the according UPS (or opt for a modular system – but this is another blog entry). It is likely therefore, that in most early data centres, the centralised UPS are running no where near their 50% loading, whereas with local point of use systems you can just add systems as and when needed, thereby ensuring that you’re not wasting power by not having the UPS operating at its sweet spot.

We’ve actually used this approach for a customer recently. He has a small computer room, that has been built up over the years and has no overall UPS support. We’ve gone in to help and look at the options. The simplest approach seemed to be to put in a 10KVA UPS and wire this in to the existing infrastructure. This would give him the UPS support he needed. However, as his data suite was provided power by several circuits we would need to run in a new power feed. We would need to add PDU’s at the output of the UPS. We would then need to wire these into the existing circuits. All of a sudden, the actual cost of the UPS started paling into insignificance with the added installation costs.

As a result, we looked at individual UPS to fit into each rack and power the server and associated equipment individually. All of a sudden the numbers started to make sense. The KR1000J is more than enough for his servers, and occupies only 2U of rack space. So the customer has opted for individual UPS systems, saving an astounding £5,000 on a centralised system!

Powered by WordPress