The Power Protection Blog

February 7, 2009

What are Square Wave Inverters Good For?

Filed under: Help Guides — Tags: , — ups_guru @ 7:01 pm

I had a query this morning, somebody unsure whether or not he should use a square wave system. Well, what are the advantages and disadvantages of this type of system?

There is only one advantage – price. A square wave system is the cheapest to produce. It requires the fewest, and cheapest components available.

When I first became involved with UPS I was astonished that square wave UPS even existed. I thought a UPS provides power when the lights go out – right? My assumption was that the power it would deliver would be equivalent, if not better than the power that was originally present. After all, as an educated electrical engineer, I knew that the mains power was a 50Hz sinewave waveform, so you would assume that a device that simulated the mains power would generate exactly the same? How wrong this assumption is. A square wave is a nasty waveform, in effect bombarding your equipment with a high frequency transient (the leading edge of the squarewave) of a voltage up to 300V 50 or 100 times per second. These transients have a damaging effect on all electrical circuitry.

So why use them?

Well, as power cuts are usually infrequent, the damaging effect of the UPS is limited. In addition, a typical PC will have a Switched Mode Power Supply (SMPS) that will appear to work fine with a square wave input. So for a home PC, for protection against infrequent power cuts, and only to prevent annoyance, rather than any critical data, a square wave system provides a cost-effective power protection solution.

A square wave system has its place, but only for non critical applications, and only for protection against infrequent short term power cuts, and then again, only for systems that have a SMPS. For anything other than this, you need to look at sinewave systems.

January 24, 2009

What’s in a brand?

Filed under: Help Guides — Tags: — toneus @ 9:36 am

We’ve been wondering why sometimes people will pay more than they need to for a UPS, when other more cost effective alternatives are available and we’ve come to the conclusion that it’s nothing more than brand awareness or brand loyalty.

Sure, there are occasions where you have your system set up to use a particular proprietary software package, or you stick with the same manufacturer as you have other UPS by the same manufacturer on site, but overall first time choice tends to be what people have told them, or they read about somewhere.

So, what makes a good UPS? Who makes good UPS? These questions are kind of analogous to car manufacturers. What makes a good car and who makes good cars? Well, the answer to what makes a good car will depend upon your own personal preferences and needs. The same can be said of UPS, however there are certain fundamentals that you would expect, namely it must be reliable and do its job. You expect a car, regardless of brand not to break down and to be able to get you from A to B. The same is to be said of UPS, you expect them to kick in when there is a power cut and not alarm or shut down when you need them most. However, if your needs are to get from Lands End to John O’Groats on one tank of fuel, then most cars will not meet this requirement, and the same can be said for certain requirements of UPS. I’m not going to go into details of UPS design and technology here, as that has been covered in other blog entries. However, for example, you cannot expect 4 hours of runtime from a little box that sits on your desk.

Another factor is price. The more you pay, the better reliability you get – right? Well, I would agree that the converse is true. The less you pay – the more you will find that costs have been taken out of the design to leave a bare bones and designed-to-the-limit system. With UPS systems, take the inverter circuit. Your cheap systems use square wave inverters, suitable only for low grade power protection, so you can’t expect a whole lot of quality from such systems. However you will find that even the best of manufacturers make these low grade systems as well.

Take APC, probably the Ford of the UPS industry, they have a range of top-end design including online double conversion systems, and some bog standard square wave offline systems that (IMHO) are not to be used for anything than providing protection against annoyance power cuts for your Grandmother’s PC.

Powerware, have an excellent reputation and sell great UPS systems (we like them so we sell them), but even their product line is mixed. They do cheap and cheerful offlline, but now their line interactive range is muddied by several different confusing (in our opinion) options. Take a 1KVA line interactive UPS, you could get the 5110 at £131, or the 5115 at £227 or the 5125 at £239. Well, Powerware have assured me they are all sinewave inverters -even though the specs on the 5110 don’t say – so please explain the £100 difference between the 5110 and 5125 I hear you say. The fact is, the 5125 is a much more superior UPS system that I would be far happier using for an important application than the 5110. From personal experience I worked for one of the high end UPS manufacturers – UPS systems that were built on high reliability. One of my customers had an analytical system that had, as part of its design a unsmoothed half wave rectified power system. This caused havoc with the inverter circuit. So much so, that after a few discharges, the inverter capacitors got so hot they exploded. Nothing dangerous, but of course the UPS was now completely defunct. We investigated a multitude of systems to work with this load and the only one we found was the 5125 UPS.

The point I’m making here, is that even with an established highly regarded brand such as Powerware there are differences in quality of product across the range, so you can’t always rely on the manufacturer being a good guide as to the quality of the system you are getting.

Those of you, not in the UPS industry are probably going to be startled at the next point. Particularly, in the single phase market, many UPS systems from many different manufacturers are actually the same UPS system with different badges on. They are all made by the big Asian UPS manufacturers and are rebadged for the manufacturers here. So sometimes when you think that you should pay more for a recognised brand, that’s all you are paying for – the brand, because the innards are identical!

We sell, in the main 5 different manufacturers. We have our niche products from Powervar and Oneac, designed for specialist applications and requiring specific needs that the major brands don’t do. Then we have Powerware, who provide an extensive portfolio with an excellent reputation. Then we have Opti and Kehua. Who are Opti and Kehua? Well, Opti are part of the company that manufacturers UPS for a whole host of other manufacturers. Their quality is as good as, if not better than a lot of systems out there. If you’re looking for a high end UPS system, then you can’t go wrong with an Opti product, and they’re available here at competitive prices.

So Kehua, where do they fit in? I would say Kehua are the no-frills end of the UPS spectrum. They don’t pack their systems full of features that many of us would never even use, they just manufacture UPS systems that do the job they’re intended to do. They also OEM for European names, so their product quality is unquestioned. If I had to sum up Kehua in terms of a brand – they are the Ronseal of the UPS industry – does exactly what it says on the tin.

Tony Bell

December 9, 2008

Tier III Data Centres

Filed under: Applications,Help Guides — Tags: — ups_guru @ 10:12 am

The decision to create a Tier III Data Centre is a strategic one, usually as as result of the necessity of creating an extremely fault tolerant system, either for customer demand (website hosting for example) or for business continuity reasons (credit card processing, military, financial etc.).

The Tier III data centre was conceived when computer systems were introduced that had dual power supplies. The basis of the Tier III centre is that there is one power path with redundancy, and an alternate power path:

Tier III Data Center Power Flow

Tier III Data Center Power Flow

Note that essential cooling is now added to the UPS output, whereas with Tier I and II it was expected that the site could cope with short downtime of cooling during which time the generators would power up and restart the system. In Tier III this is not allowed and cooling is continuous. This needs to be borne in mind when selecting the type and size of UPS. It is for this reason that you will often find rotary UPS systems (with their ability to handle mechanical loads better than static systems) used for such applications, although this is by no means a requirement.

The computer systems are dual powered (commonly referred to as A & B inputs). If a computer system is utilised without dual inputs it is expected that a local Static Transfer Switch (STS) is utilised.

In the diagram above we will assume that the primary power path is A, and the secondary power path is B. The Static Transfer Switch (STS) also has primary and secondary inputs, and the primary input is also taken from Path A. The computers are therefore supplied by two power inputs, all of which is provided by the UPS systems. Should the primary power fail anywhere along Path A, then the Static Transfer Switch will revert to its secondary input and continue to supply power along Path B to the load.

NOTE: Static Transfer Switches are capable of switching within μsecs between their A & B inputs provided the two sources are synchronised. If they are not then there will be a switching delay. This is particularly important when you consider the issue of selectivity, i.e. the ability of the source to clear a fault. In order to achieve this selectivity, UPS are synchoronised with their bypass input. Should a fault occur they can switch to bypass instantaneously (quickly anyway) which then will allow a greater fault current allowing the fault to be cleared quickly (ie pop a fuse or trip a breaker) without causing disruption to other equipment on parallel circuits. This means that the primary and secondary sources should be synchronised. Make sure this can be done! Another factor of having unsynchronised inputs is for the potential of having 400V (not 230V) AC within the computer room cabinet.

As you can see, a Tier III is inherently more robust as it will allow failure along the entire path without power being lost. This is what classifies a Tier III system – it is basically a Tier II system with an alternate power path, derived from a seperate source. A Tier III centre has an availability of 99.982% which equates to 1.6 hours of downtime per year.

So how does this help the average computer room user? Well, Tier III is probably way over the top for an SME computer room. I have known small financial companies that require the fault tolerance of the Tier III infrastructure, however Tier III is more strategic and therefore the site is designed from the beginning with Tier III in mind. It is difficult to post fit a Tier III system without severe disruption to the existing business. However, if you required just a little more protection against unplanned outages, it may not be too difficult to install a secondary power path and an STS to feed your computers. Or another alternative may be to look at a halfway house for Tier IV…….

December 5, 2008

Tier II Data Centres

Filed under: Applications,Help Guides — Tags: — ups_guru @ 10:25 am

Tier II centres encompass all the features of Tier I centres with the addition of redundant critical power and cooling components.

Tier II Data Centre Power Path

Tier II Data Centre Power Path

 

Each component must be capable of operating if the other component fails. This is typically achieved with n+1 redundancy. What this means is that if ‘n’ eg 2, modules are required to support the load then install ‘n+1′, i.e. 3. There is a lot of debate as to what determines true redundancy. For example, some manufacturers have seperate UPS modules, controlled by a single controller. If the controller fails then the system fails, so this is not true redundancy, although they may argue that the controller is designed with redundancy built in.

Some UPS modules don’t have an internal static bypass and instead rely upon a wrap around static bypass. The argument here is that one large wrap around is more robust than several smaller ones, as smaller systems may blow up one by one due to a race condition in the event of a fault. My belief is that the latter is unlikely as static switching can occur in μseconds, probably about a thousand times quicker than the time needed to damage the single static switch. In any case, the static switch is usually rated many times higher than the nominal load current to accommodate fault currents. However, the wrap around is now a single point of failure in the system – although if it fails, this will only cause a problem if the system needs to bypass, so is this a problem?. The debate will continue to rage on.

Historically, UPS were configured in what was known as a “hot standby” configuration to achieve redundancy. In this instance two UPS are fed from the utility, but the output of the standby UPS is fed to the bypass input of the primary UPS. The primary UPS provides power and if it fails (and bypasses), the standby unit will then provide UPS power to the load via the bypass of the primary. Works in principle, and can be used with mixed manufacturers and ratings of different UPS systems, however, the primary UPS output is a single point of failure. In addition, should the primary UPS fail, the secondary UPS will instantaneously be expected to deliver from 0 to 100% load immediately. Shouldn’t be a problem, but sometimes it is!

The modern method of achieving redundancy is to share the load equally amongst the UPS modules (this is how all our Kehua Parallel Systems operate). The UPS talk to each other through redundant communications ports and no one UPS is master over the others. If any UPS should fail, the UPS is isolated from the others automatically.

Enough about redundancy, the Tier II centre is more robust than the Tier I centre however still has one power path and therfore there are times during faults or planned maintenance that the computers have to be powered down. As a result a Tier II centre has availability of 99.741% equating to 22.7 hours of downtime per year. Not much better than Tier I on the face of it (28.8 hours), however Tier II is more robust against unplanned outages.

So how does this impact the normal computer room? As said under Tier I then it depends upon the financial impact of downtime to your business. For SME’s that rely on computer systems, but will all go to the pub if the power is off, then there is perhaps no need to keep the computers running for hours on end, simply shut down gracefully and that’s that. Where you don’t want to have to shut down the system to perform maintenance on the UPS, and don’t want to leave the system vulnerable to power cuts or surges when using an external bypass switch, then you will need redundancy. Like all things in life, it’s a choice based upon your needs and wants.

It’s worth stating that Tier Standards are only a guide as to the robustness of a site against outages, there is no standard or law dictating that this is the way it should be. Use the information as a guide to what is best for your business.

December 4, 2008

Tier I Data Centres

Filed under: Applications,Help Guides — Tags: — ups_guru @ 5:20 pm

Tier I data centres provide a dedicated site infrastructure to support IT Systems and include:

  • A dedicated space for IT systems
  • A UPS to filter power spikes, sags and protect against momentary outages
  • Dedicated Cooling Equipment
  • A Backup Generator to protect against prolonged outages

There is a single power path delivering power to the load and redundancy is not required. As a result any component or distribution path failure will impact the computer systems.

Power Flow Schematic for a Tier I Data Center

Standby Power Flow Schematic for a Tier I Data Center

During normal operation the UPS is providing clean power and protecting the load. A short term power outage will see the UPS continue to provide power to the computers but the cooling system will be shut down. During extended outages the generators will activate allowing continuing operation of the computers and the cooling system will restart. Any planned work will more than likely require the computer systems to be shut down.

Tier I data Centres have an availability of 99.671%, which equates to over 28.8 hours downtime per year (Planned and Unplanned).

For a typical computer room, a Tier 1 set up is more than likely adequate, with the addition perhaps of a redundant UPS module (see Tier II). The use of a generator is optional and dependent upon the impact of downtime to the business. The IT equipment can be configured to shut down gracefully in the event of a extended power failure, and the fact that lost data has been avoided is probably acceptable for many businesses.

Data Centre Classification: How UPS fit in to the Tier Classification

Filed under: Applications,Help Guides — Tags: — upsmart @ 4:23 pm

Over the next week we’ll be blogging about how UPS are required and configured to achieve Tier I, Tier II, Tier III and Tier IV levels.

The Tier system has been developed by The Uptime Institute as an objective basis for comparing the capabilites of one particular design topology over another or to compare groups of sites.

We will be showing that (at least as far as power is concerned) how we can have move from Tier to Tier level depending upon the requirements of the data center, and how best to utilise these classifications into everday computer rooms. After all, not every business will need the stability of a modern data center.

Watch this space.

December 3, 2008

How to Achieve Compliance with EN60601-1

Filed under: Applications,Help Guides — Tags: , — ups_guru @ 12:35 pm
Current leaks to earth through filters and stray capcitance

Current leaks to earth through filters and stray capcitance

When used in a medical application within the vicinity of a patient, Uninterruptible Power Supplies need to conform to EN60601-1. For details about this please see the Medical UPS or Medical Grade UPS post.

We have a range of Medical Grade UPS up to 1.44KVA. This is big enough for most applications, however what if you require 2KVA or 3KVA? Well the answer is to use a medical grade power conditioner.

These work as they contain an isolation transformer, and rebond the output neutral to the earth conductor (which otherwise passes straight through) thereby eliminating comon mode noise (the raison d’être of a power conditioner) but also ensuring that any earth leakage flows in the secondary of the transformer and not back to the source.

You connect the power conditioner to the wall outlet, the UPS to the power conditioner, and the load to the UPS.

With a medical conditioner, the leakage current is maintained in the secondary

With a medical conditioner, the leakage current is maintained in the secondary

December 2, 2008

When is the UPS System actually ON?

Filed under: Help Guides,Technology — Tags: — ups_guru @ 2:53 pm

One of the features of double conversion Uninterruptible Power Supplies is that they contain a “Bypass” circuit. This means that in the event of a UPS failure they will circumvent power around the UPS and continue to provide power to the load. One point to note here is that the UPS will continue to provide power even when it may be switched off!

This is different to the operation of line interactive and standby types. You press the OFF button, and then the load is switched off. Press it on again, and there it is, back again.

Now with online systems, generally they will start up in bypass. So you connect power and lo and behold, you have power to the load. Don’t leave it at that!! You must remember to switch on the inverter or you will not be protected.

The UPS will indicate Bypass operation, and will indicate inverter operation when switched on. It’s a feature of online systems that will extend reliability of power to the load, but only if the correct operation of the unit is observed. After all, what’s the point of protecting your system only to leave it switched off?

December 1, 2008

Power Problems and How to Eradicate Them

Filed under: Help Guides — Tags: , — ups_guru @ 7:06 pm

It is generally accepted there are 10 forms of power disturbance (IEC62040-3):

# Problem Definition Duration Causes Effects
1 Mains Failure A complete drop in the power
supply.
>10msec Numerous, including weather,
system faults, human error, circuit breaker tripping, accidental disconnection
etc.
Equipment fails to operate
2 Voltage Fluctuations Momentary drop or raise in supply
voltage
<16msec Large loads starting up, high
source impedance, overload of supply network
Equipment resets, crashes, hardware
damage
3 Voltage Transients Momentary rise (or fall) in
supply voltage. Can be catastrophic
<16msec Two fold, by equipment switching
off, especially inductive machines, or by lightning strikes
Equipment damage
4 Undervoltage or Brown-Out Prolonged undervoltage Potentially Continuous High loading or overload on
network, intentional supply reduction
Equipment malfunction, failure
to operate, crashes, hardware damage
5 Overvoltage or White-Out Prolonged overvoltage Potentially Continuous Low loading on network, faulty
supply regulation
Hardware damage
6 Lightning Effects Effects due to lightning <1ms, Sporadic Nearby Lightning Strikes, Strikes
to power lines.
Hardware damage, equipment malfunction
7 Voltage Surges/Spike Large Magnitude Over or Under
Voltage
<4ms Inductive machinery switching,
lightning
Hardware damage, equipment malfunction.
8 Frequency Fluctuation Variation from the supply frequency Periodic Generator loading. Hardware damage, equipment malfunction
9 Voltage Bursts Repetitive High Frequency Transients Periodic Electronic Equipment, machinery Hardware damage, equipment malfunction
10 Harmonic Distortion Distortion of the power waveform
from pure sinewave
Potentially Continuous Non linear loads, eg computer
power supplies, rectifiers, variable speed drives, etc.
Equipment Damage, overheating
in equipment and supply cables. Nuisance breaker tripping.

So depending upon what level of problem you are experiencing, or what your risk analysis tells you what you should protect against determines the choice of product used:

# Problem Method used to eradicate
1 Mains Failure A UPS system – VFD, VI, or VFI
2 Voltage Fluctuations A Voltage Regulator, or VI/VFI
UPS
3 Voltage Transients A Surge Supressor and Filter
4 Undervoltage A Voltage Regulator or VI/VFI
UPS
5 Overvoltage A Voltage Regulator or VI/VFI
UPS
6 Lightning Effects A Surge Suppressor with filter
or power conditioner
7 Voltage Surges/Spike A Surge Supressor and Filter
8 Frequency Variation A VFI UPS system
9 Voltage Bursts A filter, surge supressor (with
filter) or power conditioner
10 Harmonic Distortion A VFI UPS system (protects load)

Since most UPS systems will contain a surge supressor and filter, a UPS is the ideal power protection solution, however consider a power conditioner if you do not require any form of battery backup. The choice of system will be made according to the following table:

#
Problem
PC
VFD
VI
VFI
1 Mains Failure
N
Y
Y
Y
2 Voltage
Fluctuations
N
Y
Y
Y
3 Voltage
Transients
Y
?
?
Y
4 Undervoltage
N
N
Y
Y
5 Overvoltage
N
N
Y
Y
6 Lightning
Effects
Y
?
?
Y
7 Voltage
Surges/Spike
Y
N
N
Y
8 Frequency
Variation
N
N
N
Y
9 Voltage
Bursts
Y
?
?
Y
10 Harmonic
Distortion
N
N
N
Y

Note that 3, 6 and 9 are grey areas, VFD and VI may provide protection against these, dependent upon type of UPS and level of protection employed.

Other Considerations
Once you have decided on the minimum level of technology needed you will need to look at the options you require, and if there are any special requirements. For example, you may need the unit to be situated in a rack server, or the UPS may need to be used in a patient vicinity environment and therefore have special certification requirements. You may have long run time requirements, and need to choose a UPS that can deal with this.

©2008 UPSMart

November 21, 2008

Run Time Selector

Filed under: Announcements,Help Guides — Tags: , — upsmart @ 9:40 am

It seems the market is craving run time at the moment, based on the number of enquiries we receive for long runtime units. So much so, that we’ve developed our online runtime selector to help you with your selection.

Just enter the VA you require and select the runtime from the drop down. Hit Enter and lo and behold, there it is, a selection of all KR series UPS that meet your requirements. What couldn’t be simpler?

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress